The initiative, outlined in a White Paper issued on December 16, seeks to transfer decision-making powers and funding from Westminster to local authorities, including those in Hampshire and the Solent region.
If implemented, the changes could see the local authority gain greater control over key areas such as housing, transport, and skills development.
READ MORE: Devolution plans spark fears that powers could be taken from local communities
For residents, this could mean more responsive and locally tailored solutions—whether addressing housing shortages, improving public transport, or creating targeted job training programmes to boost the local economy.
One of the primary benefits of devolution is the promise of additional funding for local councils.
But, the transition comes with complications. One potential disruption is the postponement of local elections.
If Hampshire is selected as a priority area for devolution, the 2025 county council elections could be delayed. The government has confirmed that this would allow time for public consultations and negotiations without interference from the pre-election period, ensuring a smoother implementation of the new system.
In addition to the potential postponement of elections, the reorganisation could mean Basingstoke and Deane becomes part of a unitary authority, merging with other councils to streamline governance.
While this could reduce bureaucracy, some local leaders worry it may dilute Basingstoke’s unique identity and shift resources away from its priorities. Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council is one of the wealthiest local authorities in the UK, while Hampshire County Council is facing significant financial challenges.
While the details of the devolution agreement remain uncertain, the potential advantages for Basingstoke include increased funding, greater local autonomy, and a stronger voice in decision-making.
SEE ALSO: Manydown: Work starts to build junctions for development
Key questions revolve around the future structure of councils, how services will be delivered, and whether Basingstoke’s unique needs and identity will be safeguarded.
With proposals including the creation of unitary councils and the possibility of Basingstoke bearing a disproportionate share of housing development, local councillors are divided over how best to navigate this transformative process.
On one side, proponents argue devolution offers an opportunity to unlock economic potential, simplify governance, and reinvest in vital public services. On the other, there are concerns that a larger, more distant council structure could dilute local voices and shift resources away from Basingstoke’s priorities.